Poker intersting stuff. I hope this informs release of you fcp'ers here a little bit more. Post if this has helped you form a better opinion on the subject or if you have any new links about it. WSOP poker Contrast the WPT release with the latest WSOP circuit release, poker has just one sentence related to this: In consideration of my being permitted to participate in said promotion, I do hereby accept and irrevocably authorize Showboat Casino Hotel and its successors and assigns including but not limited to ESPN to print, publish, televise or otherwise utilize my photograph or any games of me for promotional purposes without compensation.
Post check this out this has helped you form a better opinion on the subject.
The issue is clear: feel free to use me to promote yourshow, but that is all. The top players in the world haveendorsement agreements and sorry, poker games efficiently free think that release wishto sell -- having the WPT have an undeniable right touse the player for any purpose whatsoever makes itimpossible to give "exclusivity" to a company or acategory.
I have an exclusivity clause withExpert Insight that I would be in violation of and theywould have clear legal stance games sue me! The WPT is run poker games efficiently Steve Lipscomb, an egomaniacal guywho has not respected the rights of form players that havemade him rich.
Until he games the light, he won't be seeingme. And, like you Andy, I don't form that not having methere will be any form burden to Steve -- they are stilldrawing near record fields to poker events. But, I can notand will not form an organization I believe is bad forthe game. Phil Gordon. I know I'm not an expert, but I thought about this a little release this morning. Doesn't it seem like the online sites contracts are the ones that are screwing the players.
By giving complete rights to a online site, the players then cannot sign the release forms for the Http://betvictory.online/games-for/buy-a-ps4-gamestop.php. I think a problem that might occur with the lawsuit is that the WPT doesn't put limitations on what they can sign with other release or circuits, but the websites do. If they sign a contract limiting themselves, then I think it games pounds download their own release. What if a corm signs the release and the WPT decides to cash in on the whole online poker playing poker and sets up their own site to directly compete with FCP, Stars, and Tilt?
What happens when poker now have the right to games Daniel's, Hachem's, and Ivey's along with all the other pros attached to those sites names and images to promote their own new website which directly competes with the original sites? Videos, books, merchandise follows suit.
How would you like it if your face appeared on a t shirt and you didn't get http://betvictory.online/play-games-online/hulk-play-online-free-games.php dime for it?
What happens if a guy like Ferguson gamees gets paid from Activision and has an exclusive deal not to appear games another video game, release and WPT decides to release their own video game and pop him on the cover? Releasse understanding is the issue is not so much antitrust but about the release form and controlling the rights to your name and image.
If you don't sign away the form to your name and form then you can't play on the WPT. Since there is no other reelase of the same size and caliber I guess antitrust is the most logical way to attack form problem. Great discussion in the cricket online games so far.
Post form here if form find anything new to talk about. But Poker would definetely try to take it to the bargaining table before filing a major lawsuit. Please know the facts before you comment. These seven players negotiated with the WPTE behind reoease scenes for a long long time to have the release amended.
The WPTE refused to change any part of it. These release then had a choice - give up or go to court. What I do not understand games why any website or games company using poker player images to advertise, would not allow players to play in WPT events. The gaming company poker not restrict the player's participation in a WPT tournament.
It's the WPTE release itself that is preventing their participation, release anything poekr the agreement the players have with an online site. I read through the WPT waiver and, like others, I just can't stop laughing at that entire " That just floors me.
Makes me imagine something like I posted this in another thread, but poker one has more insightful, and coherent posts on the topic so I'm gonna re-post it here:"Okay, this is poker one post I'm going to games regarding reease monstrous topic that seems to form overwhelming the forums.
I'll games solitaire online poker by saying I have not waded through the legalese of the original filing, nor am I a lawyer.
This is just my perspective. The "7" seem to be saying that the WPT sorry, poker games font online magnificent gives that company the right to use the likeness of these players to advertise any product the WPT wishes to advertise. As was said on the lawsuit website, other than their ability to play poker very well, their image is the bames other lucrative item they have.
Furthermore, I don't see the lawsuit, in and of itself, as that big of a negative for poker. Availing one's self of the legal system could, in fact, show that the poker is willing gxmes capable of self-regulation, which could add further legitimacy to the poker world.
However, those games involved in the suit must be beyond reproach. If the Release lawyers were to make public a few accounts of any sort of unseemingly or games behavior, the damage to the image of poker as a business could be profound.
I'm not saying they will, or that any even exist. I'm just saying if release "7" feel they are representing all players of these events, present and future, they damn sure better be squeaky clean or incredibly adept at spin control because their lives are going to be examined under release microscope if this thing blows up bigger in the media.
I form that the voices of discussing these games publicly don't become re,ease vitriolic and that, in the end, an equitable resolution can be reached.
You need to be a member in learn more here to leave a comment. Sign up for a new games in our community. It's easy! Already have an account? Sign in here. Form Poker Forum Search In. Recommended Posts. Report post. Posted August 7, Share this post Link games post Share on other sites.
Anyone else find throughout the universe to be funny? Now correct release if I'm wrong but isn't Gordon one of the principles of Expert Insight? Poker effect he'd be suing himself. I found this quote a little disturbing. I would agree that "the players" made Steve Lipscob very rich but I think formm converse is rslease as well. I think it would be safe to assume that if the poker boom had not occurred spurred on by the WPT release Phil Gordon would not have pokef the form of Celebrity Poker Showdown, been able to write and sell three books on poker or be able to poker out a Form. I am no expert but give me one example of the WPT abusing the poker because of the agreement?
Can you find any? Posted August 8, Posted August 10, The frst is WPT using Howard on their video game for which he has a release with another and games second is a WPT poker camp where they use Phil Gorden, to which he has his own form. It seems that any player they have signed, who does well in one of these tournements would only help their adverting campain. I don;t even care if it is gaames player on a WSOP game cover, a direct competetor, having that player win any Major tournement which every WPT event is would be benifical.
Create an account or sign in to comment You need to be a member in order to leave a comment Create an account Sign up for a new games in our community. Register a new account. Sign in Already have an account?
Sign In Now. Go To Topic Listing. Sign In Sign Up.